@mes: Great stuff Ben! FYI post to my MES Science community! (the default on 3Speak is the Threespeak community, so you'll have to do a search when selecting the community, see image below).
Synthetic AC Model Explainer Video by @beneficencetv on 3Speak
▶️ Watch on 3Speak --- Synthetic AC is a model that proposes a new way of understanding pulsed electrical systems through the lens of field interaction and cavitation dynamics. In this presentation...
Tags: #zeropointenergy #freeenergy #syntheticac #rodincoil #alternativeenergy #fringescience #electromagnetics #physics
Welcome to today's explainer. Let's dive right in. Have you ever suspected that our standard measurement tools are, well, completely failing to capture the true efficiency of non-linear, open energy systems? More importantly, how do we mathematically prove they're missing the big picture? Today, we're unpacking a really fascinating peer-reviewed proposal aimed directly at electrical engineers. We're looking at the synthetic AC model. It's a groundbreaking framework that literally challenges the foundation of how we measure electrical efficiency. Here's our agenda for today. We'll start with the RMS measurement problem, then move into building on Bearden and Bedini. After that, True versus Synthetic AC, followed by partitioning energy events. Then we'll look at the corrected cope methodology, and finally, wrap up with field cavitation and geometry. Section 1. The RMS Measurement Problem So, to kick things off, we absolutely have to address a glaring mathematical blind spot built right into standard engineering tools. If we miss this, the whole model falls apart. Mainstream tools rely heavily on the root mean square or RMS formula. But here's the catch. RMS acts kind of like a statistical blender. It takes these sharp, high-energy spikes, like a sudden reactive negative 168-volt output and artificially smooths them out into this gentle, artificial average. with squaring and square root operations, RMS values just don't obey linear addition. They effectively mask the raw, instantaneous reality of what the energy is actually doing in the circuit. And the root of this error? It's pretty profound. Standard engineering treats open non-equilibrium systems as if they're governed by equilibrium thermodynamics. It's like looking at stagnant water in a sealed pot, uniform temperature, zero net flow. But these non-linear systems, they're totally open. You really have to think of them more like a persistent whirlpool that's continuously maintained by environmental gradients. If you try to use closed system math on an open system whirlpool, you are always going to get the wrong answer. Which brings us to Section 2, Building on Bearden and Bedini. To actually build a correct mathematical framework for these open systems, we get to stand on the shoulders of the pioneers who first spotted these anomalies. This methodology doesn't just pull ideas out of thin air. Instead, it unites proven concepts. It takes Tom Bearden's brilliant work on dipole preservation and asymmetric regaging, and weaves it seamlessly with John Bedini's pulse principles and his capture of the radiant collapse component. Add in Tesla's time asymmetric impulse technology, and we're combining all these foundational observations into one incredibly coherent, measurable, and rigorously mathematical framework. Moving right along to Section 3, True v. Synthetic AC. This is where we hit a really critical taxonomy correction. We have got to separate actual alternating current from synthetically constructed bi-directional waveforms. Think of true AC like a closed pipe where water is shoved forward and then yanked back along the exact same path. It's constantly fighting its own momentum, which creates friction and heat. Every forward push gets completely undone by the backward pull. But synthetic AC, it's like two people taking turns firing ping-pong balls into a central zone. It's an open, carefully choreographed sequence of totally independent, time-asymmetric events. It isn't just reversing, it's sequencing. In understanding this difference highlights exactly why that RMS blind spot is so dangerous. If you compare classical AC to synthetic AC, the two waveforms might look completely identical on an RMS meter, literally indistinguishable. But the reality of how they're generated, how they release energy, and how they actually perform work is radically different. Grouping them together is a huge inherent contradiction, and that's exactly what this new model fixes. Section 4. Partitioning Energy Events. Now that we've established they're different, we need to talk about how to partition these actual energy events to measure them properly. But before we partition anything, we have to toss out the loop fallacy. Conventional electronics teaches us that energy flows inside the wire in a neat little closed loop, but in reality, energy travels through the space around the wire as an electromagnetic field envelope. Engineers know this as the pointing vector. And because the energy is sitting in the space, the forward work and the backward radiant collapse don't actually have to fight each other inside the same wire. We can geometrically guide them along entirely separate pathways. Just look at these oscilloscope captures. When energy is partitioned correctly, using specialized geometry and high-speed switching, something beautiful happens. Over on the microscale, you see these chaotic, bouncing, nested harmonics, but zoom out to the macro scale, and those exact same harmonics perfectly converge into an incredibly smooth, emergent, and highly efficient sine wave. The energy isn't just sloshing back and forth anymore, it's genuinely synergizing. Section 5. The Corrected Cop Methodology Let's look at the new mathematical methodology and see how it builds a rigorously corrected coefficient of performance, or COP. This is exactly what electrical engineers have been waiting for. To actually prove the COP is greater than one, we have to follow some precise steps. We start by completely abandoning RMS averaging. Instead, we use instantaneous power integration. This lets our framework treat each temporal window as an isolated thermodynamic event. We measure absolutely everything in units of work, Jules. This allows us to mathematically validate the system's true efficiency, completely bypassing that statistical blurring of RMS, First up, we calculate the true instantaneous input energy. Because the backward pulse dynamically alters the local scalar potential of the battery source, we simply can't use average input current anymore. It won't work. We have to dynamically account for phase angles. We do this by taking the integral of the instantaneous product of input voltage and current, but we do it at extremely high sampling frequencies, exactly as you see in this equation. Next, because the system physically partitions the energy into distinct spatial and temporal pathways, we have to compute the work for each path independently. So we calculate the forward energy heading to the load and the backward recovery energy returning to the source, completely independently, in absolute joules. And remember, jewels, unlike RMS values, can actually be added linearly. Once we've isolated those components, we just add the joules together to get our corrected, unified COP formula. The COP equals the forward work plus the backward work divided by the true input energy. This approach relies strictly on calculus and the absolute conservation of energy across isolated, partitioned events. It sets an incredibly rigorous standard for engineers. Honestly, it's pretty airtight. And finally, Section 6. Fueled Cavitation and Geometry. Now, you might be wondering what physical mechanism actually allows us to partition these forward and backward events in the real world. The answer lies in something called field cavitation. It's a mechanism driven entirely by specific spatial geometry. Coils with really unique winding geometries, like the ABHA or rodent coil, naturally structure the electromagnetic field so that counter-rotating components occupy the exact same spatial volume. This forces simultaneous field compression and rarefaction. You are literally cavitating the electromagnetic field, kind of like how bubbles cavitate in a fluid. Because of this specialized geometry, a localized zero-point void forms right at the equator. Think of it like a highly stable, localized desktop black hole. What this void does is critically delay the dipole collapse. By stopping the immediate recombination of the field components, it buys us the necessary time to partition and actually harvest that backward recovery energy. And to prove this is truly a geometric phenomenon, we can just change the coil. If we use the exact same circuit, but swap out the AMBHA coil for a standard flat pancake coil, that beautiful, highly efficient sine wave we saw earlier distorts into this inefficient, bell-shaped curve. It proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that visual similarity on an oscilloscope does not guarantee similar thermodynamic performance. The geometry itself is doing the heavy lifting here. Ultimately, this new taxonomy completely demystifies the coil. Our methodology proves that energy behavior is geometry -dependent, well before it is circuit-dependent. When you design it correctly, the coil isn't just a basic inductor or a transformer anymore. It becomes a unified, free-flowing, distributed element network. It's a complete resonant electromagnetic structure. This leaves us with a massive, literally, paradigm -shifting question. If standard RMS meters are mathematically blinding us to the partitioned realities of non-linear systems, If they are literally averaging away the evidence of over unity efficiency, we have to ask ourselves, what other incredible thermodynamic breakthroughs are currently hiding in plain sight just waiting for the right mathematical framework to finally reveal them. Thank you so much for joining me on this explainer. Keep asking the big questions, and I'll catch you next time.
@mes: Great stuff Ben! FYI post to my MES Science community! (the default on 3Speak is the Threespeak community, so you'll have to do a search when selecting the community, see image below).
@hivebuzz: Congratulations @beneficencetv! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s) Your next target is to reach 50 upvotes. You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP Check out our last posts: Be ready for the June edition of the Hive Power Up Month! Hive Power Up Day June 1st 2026