None Dare Call It Conspiracy - speech by Gary Allen (recorded in 1971) abridged and dramatized by @leavingtheherd on 3Speak
Reupload as 3speak (for whatever annoying reason) deleted all my uploads from when i started here on 3speak, after YouTube finally deleted my channel Leaving The Herd in 2019, for still unexplained...
Tags: #newworldorder #conspiracy #nwo #propaganda #elite
We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations, a new world order, a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision. of the UN's founders. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to tell you a story that I think would be vastly different than anything you've ever heard before. You know, we have a tremendous amount of arguing in this country between Democrats and Republicans, between liberals and conservatives, between radical leftists and radical rightists, most of whom all agree that we do have problems. They're not sure what the problems are. And a lot of people don't like to think that somebody else outside of their own group might have some valid ideas. It's a little bit like when you're a kid, and you choose up sides on the playground to play a basketball game. Your side is the good guys, and the other side is the bad guys, and somehow you have moral superiority, and the other side is totally evil. What we are going to describe today really goes across all political and ideological lines. So I say most people believe there is something dramatically wrong in this country, but they're not sure what it is. Now, what I'm going to try to do with this talk is to try to put this thing together in a sequence so that we'll all make sense to you. Now, what I have done is not make a bunch of brilliant new discoveries in this material that I'm giving to you. Most of the things that I talk about are readily verifiable at any large library, but they're scattered throughout the library. What I have done is put these events in the sequence which I believe most accurately reveals their true meaning and importance in American history. So a lot of people are aware of various individual things that are going on in this country and the things that I'll be talking about. They didn't put them together in the right sequence. Now, I used to be a high school history teacher. Believe me, I did not put these things together in their proper sequence, although I was aware of many of these things, not all of them, but most people who studied history are aware of a lot of these things, but they never put them together in their proper sequence. There are really only two theories of history. Either things happen. because nobody wants them to happen, they just happen anyway, or the important events which shape our national destinies happen because somebody wants them to happen. Now, if you want to be socially and intellectually acceptable, you must believe that everything happens by accident. We are supposed to believe that events happen because there are some mysterious tides of history which propel men and events into happening, and nobody ever wanted them to happen. I don't think what we're dealing with here is accumulated accident. I don't think that when our government stumbles from one blunder to another and keeps repeating those same blunders for administration after administration, that it can all be accidental. If you look at the consequences, it's not accidental, it's brilliant planning. Now, what I'm going to discuss with you tonight is the planning behind what is actually a conspiracy to gain power, political and economic power in this country and actually throughout the world. What I'm going to try to tell you tonight is something that is generally known as the communist conspiracy, and those are trigger words, is not run out of Moscow or Pei Ping. It's run out of New York, London, and Paris. Outline that I'm going to give to you is not a theory which I created or hold. It is a network about which I have knowledge gained not only from extensive study, but also from talking to retired military intelligence officers and former congressional investigators. There are really several thousand people in this country. and many thousands around the world that know a great deal about this conspiracy. I'm going to try to convince you that communism is just an arm of a much bigger conspiracy. Everybody knows that a man named Adolf Hitler lived. Nobody disputes that. Adolf Hitler was a man raised in poverty, high school dropout, but a man with a tremendous emotional drive to rule others, to conquer the world. And we know this man sat up and a cold garret and wrote down exactly what he planned to do. And nobody disputes that. that Lennon lived. Lennon was another man from extremely modest background, largely self-educated, but a man who also had a fantastic drive for power over others. And we know that he sat up in dark, dank garrets in Switzerland and poured out on the paper his plans for achieving that kind of power. Now, if... Somebody like Lenin or Hitler can sit up in a garret and plan to rule the world, is it not theoretically possible that a billionaire, with the same evil motivation, the same craving for power over others, might set up in his penthouse? might sit up in his penthouse in New York or London or Paris and dream the same dream that Lenin and Hitler had. I think you would have to admit that theoretically that is possible. We know that down through the ages, there have been men like Alexander the Great and Caesar. and people who had this lust for power. One reason why it is extremely difficult for the average American to believe that in this modern day and age, there would be people with a similar motivation, is the fact that the average person does not lust for power over his fellow human beings. The average guy marches to a far different drum. What does the average person want? He wants to be successful in his chosen profession. He wants to be financially comfortable. He wants to be able to take a vacation every year, wants to provide for his family and sickness and in health. He does not lust for power over other human beings. And it is very difficult for him to comprehend the fact that there are those who do have that lust for power. People who are egomaniacs who think that they have the right to control the destinies of others. We must realize that it is theoretically possible that a billionaire might have the same perverted... lust for power as a Hitler or a Lenin. And he would have a much better chance of carrying out his aims than would somebody that came from no wealth, no background, no social prestige, like Hitler or Lenin. As a matter of fact, a billionaire might hire a Lenin or a Hitler to help carry out his schemes. Now, you can believe anything you want about communism, except that it is a conspiracy run by people from the so-called legitimate world. You can believe that communism is evil, that communism wants to conquer the world. You can believe anything you want about it, except that it is a conspiracy, and that the conspiracy is run by people from the so-called legitimate world. Since everybody has a definition of communism, let me give you the one that I believe is the only truly accurate definition, and then I will proceed to try to prove that what I've said is the only logical definition. Communism is an international, conspiratorial drive for power on the part of men in high places, willing to use any means to bring about their desired aim, global conquest. Now you will notice that I did not mention dialectical materialism, or Karl Marx, or Frederick Engels. I didn't say anything about the philosophy of communism, of the pseudo-economics of communism. If we get all tied up in that bundle of snakes, then we bypass the essence of communism for the techniques what most people think of communism are really just the techniques of communism and if you do that then you become fixated at the Gus Hall level or the Leonud Brezhnev level of communism and that's not where it's at Now, we are allowed to believe in some types of conspiracies. We can believe that businessmen conspired to fix prices. We can even believe that there isn't a conspiracy of organized crime. We can do that and not lose our social position within the community. Why can we do that? Well, because Life magazine even admits that there is such a thing as organized crime. Now, it's very interesting to note that until Joseph Volachi testified before a congressional committee and told us that this group is known as the Kosa Nostra, we didn't even know it by its right name. We thought the group was the mafia. Now, here is an organization. that is well over a century old, its leadership has been passed on generation to generation, and operates internationally. And yet for over 100 years, we didn't even know its right name. Now, isn't it possible that there might be a group working in politics doing the same thing? and you might not know its name, because they didn't have a Joseph Volachi, and Life magazine didn't tell you about it? Let's draw another comparison with the mafia. Most mafia leaders had no education. They were born in slums. They got to the top of the crime. Ant Hill because they were vicious, they were ruthless, and they were cunning. Now, what if the same type of grasping personality existed in somebody who was born into a patrician family of extreme wealth? And this person went to all the finest prep schools, went on to an Ivy League college, Maybe did graduate work in England? This person would have an infinite knowledge of economics, history, sociology, psychology. Is it likely that this type of person would then go out into the world and push marijuana to high school students, to sell numbers? to work down in a slum running a house of prostitution? Would he get involved in gangland murders? Of course not. A person with this background and this education would know that the lessons of history say, if you want big money and big power, get into the political business. Get into the government business. Because that's where the big money and the big power is. And if you don't run for political office yourself, get somebody else who you control to run for you. Always better to operate through a frontman. We're not supposed to believe that people like this would get into the political game. Now, we know all about the... strivings for power in ancient Greece and ancient Rome, but we're supposed to think that somehow things have changed today. Actually, as you climb the historical ladder, the more power that a government has, the more people want to seize that power. Now, there are two facets of conspirators that we must remember. Two things they have to have in common. One is, They have to be consummate liars. You can't get away with it unless you are a tremendous liar. Your success is going to be predicated on your ability to lie. Secondly, all conspirators are planners. Careful, meticulous planners. They have to be. You have to know where you're going. You have to operate in secrecy. The whole idea of the smoke-filled rooms actually connotes planning. You know, there weren't too many things that FDR said that I agree with, but one of them was that if something happens in politics, you can bet it was planned that way. And I think he's a man who probably knew what he was talking about on that subject. Now, we have defined communism as a tyranny of power seekers, and their most powerful weapon is the big lie. There are two major lies of communism from which all others spring. There's lots of lies of communism, but there's two main ones. All others are derivative from those. The first lie is that communism is inevitable. The second lie is that communism is a movement of the downtrodden masses. rising up against exploiting bosses. Marx said, the communists of the world must work to establish socialism, the dictatorship of the proletariat. We can't have communism until we have socialism. Now, you go here, any communist speaker on a college campus, you go down to any official. Communist Party bookstore, and you look at their literature, or you listen to their speakers. They never talk about bringing communism to the United States. They always say we must finish the socialization of the United States. All communists work for socialism. a definition of socialism, don't me? What is socialism? Well, you can go to almost any dictionary and look up socialism, and it will say something about government ownership and or control over the means of production and distribution of goods and services. This is the definition of socialism that the socialist wants you to accept. I believe it is not an accurate or true definition of socialism. Socialism in reality is not a divide-the -wealth program. It is a movement to consolidate and control the wealth. It does not produce a classless society. It produces two classes the elite and the proletariat with no middle class the idea that socialism is a share of the wealth program has nothing to do with the realities of the situation who runs these countries do the people run them are things owned in common no they're run by a tiny oligarchy at the top and the reality of it is that 3 % of the people totally control the fortunes, the property, and the very lives of the other 97%. If you understand that socialism and reality is a consolidate and control the wealth program, then the seeming paradox of power-hungry, super-rich promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. It becomes a logical extension for all power seekers. If you believe that socialism is inevitable, then it's useless and futile to fight against it. And most Americans today believe that socialism is inevitable. And that's exactly what the communists and the super rich want you to believe. Now, one way in which they make you believe it is inevitable is through the definitions of the political spectrum. Now, on this first chart, we have what is commonly accepted by about 95% of the people as the political spectrum in this country. What the political science professor will say to you is something like this. On the far left of the political spectrum, we have communism, and they will usually admit that communism is dictatorial. But then in the next breath, they will say, but on the other end of the spectrum, and equally to be feared, we have the extreme right wing, which is fascism, which is also a dictatorship. Now what we all want, is to stay in this middle of the road, in democracy, by which, of course, they mean Fabian or creeping socialism. So what is the spectrum that the American people are given? You can have on the far left international socialism or communism, or you can have the far right national socialism, or fascism, or the middle of the road, which is Fabian socialism. Now, if you accept these definitions, you have to believe that socialism is inevitable because the whole spectrum is socialist. Now, if you stop and think about it, this spectrum, which almost everybody accepts, is totally fallacious. Where do you put somebody on this spectrum? who is an anarchist, who doesn't believe in any government at all? Where do you put somebody on this spectrum who believes in the free enterprise system and a limited constitutional government? There's no place on the spectrum for them. Now, there is what I think is a much more rational political spectrum, one that I think we should think in terms of. On the far left, you have total government. And it doesn't make any difference what type of name is attached to total government. Whether you call it communism or fascism or socialism or federalism, or federalism, whatever it is. It's the same thing for the people who have to live and suffer under it. Total government means that the state is all powerful, the dictatorship of the proletariat, and the people have no rights. Now, if the far left is total government, under any of the names you want to tack onto it, what logically would be the opposite of total government? Well, very obviously, the opposite of total government is no government. So if you wanted to be totally logical, the extreme right should be anarchy or no government at all. The founding fathers of this country had had experience under King George III of almost total government. And that's what they rebelled against. So they knew they wanted to set up something different. What they gave this country was a limited government, a constitutional republic, where the government had as little power as was possible consummate with keeping order. They knew if you didn't have any government at all, you'd have just chaos. Thomas Jefferson said, Speak to me not of men, but bind them down with the chains of a constitution. The whole idea of the United States Constitution was to enslave the government, to put the government in chains. In high school civics classes, they taught that one thing and didn't teach them anything else. You could dismiss class after the first day, and the kids would know 10,000 percent more than they ever knew before or they're ever taught. A Constitution is to enslave the government, because the founding fathers knew that if you don't enslave the government, the government eventually will enslave the people. It's happened every single time in history. Now, starting shortly after the turn of the century, we burst those chains of the Constitution. and we have been moving leftward across this political spectrum ever since, more and more towards total government. And we are getting very close to total government today. Our Constitution divided up governmental power and fractionalize it, and every way they could conceive of. Power within the federal government was divided between the executive branch. the legislative branch and the judicial branch. Other powers were given to the states, which further subdivided the power among courts, city government, and county government. And there were many facets of our life that our founding fathers believed were so important they didn't want the politicians to get their hands on them. Such things as education, the local police, charity, business, and to a large degree even finance and labor. Now what has happened is since we have burst these chains of the Constitution, all of these independent sectors that we had originally, all these divided powers, have now been brought together, like bringing together all the strands of wheat in a wheat field so that they all come together at the top. Now, whatever facet of our life you're dealing with, whether it is labor, finance, business, the legislative branch, the judicial branch, the states, counties, cities, charity, police, education, all is being put under the control of the executive branch of the federal government. This is the power pinnacle at the executive level. Now, if you don't remember anything from this talk, please remember what I'm about to tell you now. Under a constitutional republic, it is absolutely impossible to have a dictatorship. The reason is that no person can get his hands on enough power to be a dictator. Under the form that we are rapidly arriving at in this country, where everything... is under the executive branch, you can't avoid a dictator. A dictator becomes inevitable. As Lord Acton said, power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. We're putting absolute power in the executive branch of the federal government. Now, let's say that you and I were conspirators, and we wanted to take over the country, and we knew you have to take over the country, you have to control the government. Under a constitutional republic, there's no way you could gain control of the government. Here, when all powers in the executive branch of the government, you only have to control one man, don't you? And you gain virtual, de facto control of every other facet of American life. Now, under a constitutional republic, there's only one type of economic system that is possible. And that is the competitive free enterprise system, because the Constitution didn't give the government power to set up a fascist or socialist…