What is your take on AI generated content?

@rimurutempest: Some platforms are already change their algorithms to reduce slop ai content. AI is a tool, just like google, and could be used like that, but as humans tend to enjoy creative content, I think we just need to use it as a tool and not let it do everything.

@stdd: The world is racing forward, and it’s impossible to resist many things for more than a month. I wouldn’t want us to end up as a social network of old people for old people. We already have small (no, big) problems with that. I’m all for any technologies, including AI for avatars, videos, and the like. Still, scripts and texts will have to be written by ourselves. !ALIVE

@ekavieka: iam still ok witht that, but most of the time it is used to generated a video that spread fear that I hate the most, usually in Facebook, or youtube short. If only there will be a standard that will always tag such video as AI generated, so it will be much easier tfor us to detect those kind of content. !PIZZA !LUV

@ifarmgirl: We are at a time where AI generated content is becoming a thing. I think it's okay to welcome AI aided content here, especially for video clips or images.

@proto26: I think if it were used sparingly, I wouldn't mind. In fact I would encourage it. However, that is an ideal situation. The reality is most avid users of AI want it to generate the whole video or write the whole article for them while the human sits back with their feet up. It should enhance us, not replace us. If the human were to work alongside the AI, the end result might be a little more cohesive and less sloppy. Perhaps it might even be something of value.

@thebighigg: We need to embrace it as long as it is stated to be AI content. If someone is passing off AI as their own work I find that dishonest personally. AI is here to stay, and better to take advantage of it as long as there are rules. Pure AI posts shouldn't be rewarded, but I think the content can still be valuable!

@ladymisa: AI is the future. Embrace it instead of fighting it. :)

@dewabrata: we have authors and curators, whether it is welcomed or not it will be back to the curators. personally, I am more open to AI with some limitation and understanding, it is part of technology, why would we walk back to the past? every tech has it bad side, we need to adapt and adjust ourselves, not to fight it

@relf87: Personally I don't have issues with AI content, as long as it's meaningful and not spam. Ultimately, it's up to the community to decide who we want to give our upvotes (or even downvotes). If people don't like AI content, they can just ignore, or if they think this person is abusing, they can downvote as well.

@ervin-lemark: Before I listen/watch the video. I take it !LOLZ I am using genAI daily and frequently for work and private stuff. And no, I am not using it for publishing on social media platforms! With one exception so far: The other question is how many trees do I chop with every chat query... This is something I am not comfortable with.

@palomap3: As long as content created by AI is not pretended to be one's own, I have no problems. But it must be well differentiated, otherwise it seems dishonest and abusive to me. AI is here to stay and has many advantages. Thanks to it I can understand people who speak other languages, for example. It makes no sense to close ourselves to the evolution of technology, the question is to give it an appropriate and honest use.

@seckorama: Whenever AI is discussed, I always reiterate one thing: We cannot behave like Luddites here. Or can we? Well, then we/you will end up like some kind of last days saints. I often use Deepl, Grammarly, and Google Translate, and I suppose they use AI. Why do I use translators? Because English is not my native language, I want everything I write to be as understandable as possible to others. I'm very involved in music, and my latest project with Suno is Stoner Now. And that's mine I have all copyrights to that. And just started to learn AI videos...

@gwajnberg: AI to help is good, but not do the whole work. If you are posting an art, posting an image is bad, if you are generating text content, you can use some images just to illustrate but the text should be human generated. I use it to discuss about topics that I am writing about, sometimes it can give me an information that I wasn't aware about a topic.

@vaynard86: While the content (pictures, animation, video) can be generate by AI, the script, prompts and all needs to be human instead of AI generated.

@coquicoin: I have no problem with using AI as a tool to help improve your content, but I disagree with content generated exclusively with AI.