Transcript
Hi, this is Ed back again with another video. Shout out to everybody on, Patreon and Subscribe Star. Thank you for your support. And let's just really get right into it here. So, there's some videos where it seems like Fox News is putting some soft pressure on Donald Trump for something. And it's interesting because, of course, Fox News lately at least, has been a cheerleader for Donald Trump. they were put together polls on screen, you know, that say he's winning or whatever, but lately they've been saying, well, it isn't looking so good for him. Obviously, behind the scenes, both sides of the pendulum in the United States, like it is around the world, have different interests, and those interests are largely in relation to, you know, putting... using his oppression mechanism for politicians. So let's have a look at this odd thing. They're talking about Donald Trump here, and how his sons might be doing something that's a bit well as bad form, as they say. Of course, Donald Trump's made billions of dollars, right? His last coin that he had under his company there, a company associated with, Saudi Arabia bought half of the tokens. 45%, I think it was like hundreds of millions of dollars. The Qatar gave him a plane. Of course, he converted that into Air Force One, so I guess that's a conversion into the government, but he probably, you know, got an invoice for that, which they have to pay him back for. I would say he didn't give them the plane. So there is money exchanged there. So let's have a look at this soft attack by Fox News. We have seen 10-figure business deals breaking the Trump family's way for rare earth minerals and for cryptocurrency. The Wall Street Journal editorial board writes, assuming all of this is legal, it's still an unseemly display of using the presidency for family profit. It's hard to believe the Trump boys would be able to do the same deals if Dad wasn't in the Oval Office. The main difference between Hunter Biden's foreign dealings and the Trump project is that the Trumps are brazenly open about theirs. It's the biggest grift of all time. Donald Trump has turned the White House into his own ATM. Last year, the Wall Street Journal reported about Binance, the crypto exchange. Finance took steps that capitol to the Trump family venture's new stablecoin product, enhancing its credibility and pushing its market capitalization up from $127 million to over $2.1 billion. Its incarcerated co-founder then earned a presidential pardon. I do not have any business relationship with any of the sons of president's fault. The president insists with the stock market going up, a rising tide lifts all boats. So there you have Donald Trump, you know, a soft attack on Donald Trump basically saying, hey, you know, look at what, people are noticing. And usually, remember, the news will cover anything up. They'll cover anything up for Biden, you know, they'll have him lifting weights. It's because the machinery of the news is obviously controlled by other architects, i.e. Bilderberg, in their interests. Here have Donald Trump saying, you know, you can't help that the kids have knowledge, right? They're going to inside trade. They're going to have this knowledge because they're part of the administration. I feel badly it away from my kids because every time my kids do, if they invest in a stock or if they go and do a bill, anything they do, because the presidency is so powerful, so big, everything, if they buy a cupcake company, well, the energy to make the cupcakes is... you know, sort of like, how's my energy policy? So that is inaccurate. What's happening here, for instance, is they go on the board of a drone company, they get massive shares, then the Pentagon gives that very small, unknown drone company, like $600 million worth of contracts. That's what's happening. So now that drone company is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, right? It's worth what its revenue is. So that's what you have, and you have that over and over again. Okay. So that's what's happening, which is completely different. Donald Trump, to me, reminds me of somebody, let's say, metaphorically, that comes into the house for dinner, right? They're invited in. And then after dinner, around the middle of dinner, they don't show up, and you go to the bathroom, and you find them hammering, like, smashing holes in the walls, trying to pull out the copper piping. Because they want to sell it. right? You know, and there's nothing you can do about it, right? Because it's their house now. There's been some kind of shady, you've signed something that you didn't mean to sign, you know. Can you give me an autograph? He just sold your house to him. So another thing that's happened recently, and this is in the background, what's quite interesting, is the merging between the United States and Israeli military. Let's have a listen to... Absom of what Kim size here. Fortunately, the amendment to halt the merger of the U.S. and Israeli militaries together has failed. They have shoved this into the National Defense Act, and it will pass. This whole idea, which Netanyahu even says, was his idea. This was his plan. This did not come from our Congress members. He actually put it forward. They said, okay, we'll do whatever you want, our dear leader, Beebe, and they put it into this bill. The goal of this, according to Netanyahu, is to end U.S. aid to Israel. That's a great thing. We do want to end U.S. aid to Israel, right. The workaround is to no longer need aid from the United States military because you will just become the United States military. Okay, so I'll stop it there. By the way, when I'm playing a video, I have this thing, which is weird, like if I pause the mic or mute it, it will stop recording, so I have to do it this way now. So I just turn down the sound, which comes through the speakers. But there is what a lot of people are talking about this merging between the United States military and the Israeli military. What's interesting to me is, in the last few years, there's been a lot of contracts that have gone over to Israel. They are reinventing themselves as a type of information surveillance hub. So a lot of the biometrics go through there. This has been having for some time, not three years. A lot of the world's VPNs, In fact, people are saying nearly all the VPNs go through Israel, the traffic. Okay, so it's turning into the surveillance hub. Now, whatever architecture is projected out of that, you know, more sophisticated architecture and surveillance, computers, whatever, chip manufacturers, they've become a chip manufacturer. In fact, Apple is going to be running their chips and their new iPhones, which makes you do it, makes you wonder, doesn't it? Of course, you probably know what I'm thinking. I don't have a phone anyway, I don't have a smartphone. But that's what's happening. So this type of merger is hugely enormously beneficial to all of those companies over there in Israel, right? all of those companies become integrated into the United States military and going to have massive insane contracts. So everyone's going to be insanely wealthy. Now, as Donald Trump, who set this up, this is basically an initiative by the Trump administration, but both houses, you know, both houses, Democrats, Republicans, so on and so forth, want this to happen. Okay, so it's a unanimous thing, basically, apart from Massey, who's... you know, been primaried out soon. I mean, he's not going to be there that much longer. And so you have, you have all these, well, you know, you have all this energy to make this happen. Most likely it will happen. Those contracts will be worth insane amounts of money over there, right? There'll be a lot of billionaires that will pop up overnight, and it's true to Donald Trump's word. He is the greatest friend of Israel, right? This is probably... the biggest kind of like gift to Israel you could possibly have, and that's the entire United States military. It's so strange to me that it happens so fast, but then that shows you the power. Here is a little, by the way, happy Fourth of July to everybody in the United States, obviously a few days past the fourth, but, you know, I hope you had a good one. Special day there. you know, independence, etc, you know, you throw the tea overboard. I think it was like for 1% tax, wasn't it? Now it's up to like 30 or 40 % tax. But, you know, that's the way it is everywhere, right? A lot of things in this world change in, you know, an insane way, and they change without anything, right? For instance, income tax, went throughout the world suddenly you have this new tax right here in new zealand's the same thing suddenly we have to pay tax on all income when that didn't exist before there was a tax but it wasn't the same thing the same thing in the united states same thing in many countries is just rolled out without uh without any resistance whatsoever but yes happy fourth of july to everyone of course dodge itself a self-deletes on the fourth of july the grand experiment comes to an end, or at least that is what people are saying from that screen cap there. A lot of these things were never ratified, as Elon Musk said himself, a lot of the changes in the United States government were never ratified at all. He said it couldn't be fixed because no one carried out and actually fixed those things. USAID, apparently got some big cuts, maybe that was the only partial victim, of course it's probably full up and running. Some people noticed, as I think I said the other day, although I might not have said it, I just repeat it here, is that what they found is since USAID has been shut down, shut down in quotation marks, since it's been shut down, there have been no number one rap songs anymore. No, Takashi 6969, of course. Well, those types of people, right, the rap songs, you know, the gold-plated things on the cars. And look how severely that's changed since the 70s, when you have, like, soul music, like, Chai Lights and things like that, at least in the black community over there, and then it's been morphed into equivalent of Takashi 6969, just really music that. kind of promotes what? Promotes grotes, consumerism is what it, you know, and what I mean is, like, just, you know, there's an interesting thing, it's just buying a bunch of watches, right, that have all the gold stuff on them and diamonds, that are worth less now when you're holding it than it was before, right? You pay a million dollars for it, and tomorrow it's worth only really... probably its namesake, its namesake carries a little bit, but largely it's just worth its scrap value, which is probably one-tenth, one-twentieth of the actual watch itself. So what you're paying for is purely brand naming, but it's kind of like this brand naming where it doesn't really have any long -term value. Right, a lot of these brands that make these things, you know, single artisans or, you know, an artisan watchmaking. place or jewelry making place, right? You go to Trax in New York and you pay him $100,000 and you have something made, right? He'll just go and get someone to make it. That's fine. But think of it, it's not like you're buying a Rolex Submariner from like the 1960s or something, which would perhaps appreciate and value, as you've seen with Rolex. No, it's about building these weird custom, no -name brand things that are kind of like meaningless. They're just meaningless. It's like everything you buy in terms of a small asset actually has no value the next day, or it has less value the next day. It's like depreciating assets like cars or whatever the case is. If you buy, like, I don't know, James Dean's car, which people have, it's the same car that James Dean drove, you would have an appreciating asset, right? It would be something that would be worth a lot of money. right? It's got historical significance, it's got things attached to it. I'm just talking about things like paintings or whatever. No, it's just this watch that means nothing, or this necklace that means nothing. And where is the career path for advancement? Where does Takashi 6969 take you? What to prison? But that's the vector. When USAID was shut down, a lot of the, there hasn't been... For the first time, I think I was saying in 35 years, I can't remember the video I played the other day. Even if I did play the video, I forgot in. But it was like, for the first time of 35 years, there has not been a number one rap song. And that was this year and last year since USAID was shut down. People were saying that USAID was pumping it up. It's an interesting scenario when you think about it tactically. For instance, if you are going to run the cartels, right? If you are really running at the top level, you are running like, you know, cocaine is saying to the United States and making huge amounts of money, you need to create a culture of distribution to do that, right? A culture in terms of distributors. And that's really what RAP does. It combines a number of different factors in order to create this kind of image of, you know, like a young 50 cent having a deal things. Now, 50 cent probably did what he had to do, and a lot of people... live hard lives. But what you want to do is you want to magnify that and create like a culture of it. So you're never in a position where you don't have, you know, if people say, oh yeah, but you could find someone to distribute it everywhere. That's true. But if you have, let's say, 100 units of distribution. in terms of produced by a community, you're going to produce maybe less, let's just give an example here, maybe one or two units that are significant capabilities within their chosen, that cultural field, right, of significant abilities of distributing, or have all the mechanics and mental mechanics, to be able to do that, you know, to be able to do something that's illegal. Okay, but if you have a thousand units, because you're popularizing it, then up the top you might have 50 or 100 of these significant units, and you want to keep on producing significant kind of individuals that can do the task at hand. So you create a culture of crime. This is what you do. Now, that could be one specific vector, or it could be a tension mechanism that's just forever creating tension or one... that brings down the black community. For example, a lot of black rap, as I heard, I think it was KS1, a few others, he's a very intellectual person, he's also an expert on the Freemasons and things like that. I believe he is a Freemason. I could be mistaken about that, but he does know a lot about these kinds of things. Talking about guns, I think it was him, I could be mistaken, but this is an old... thing that a lot of people talk about is the guns left around in the ghettos, right? You know, suddenly there were these container ships of AK-47s showed up. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? And it's like, I remember, and I played this one, it was the guy that's, what's his name, the lead singer of the Smashing Pumpkins, Billy Corgan. talking about how it's strange that in the 90s, you know, rock was being played everywhere, right? There was all this rock music, right? All this rock music. And then rock started to get a little bit political, okay? And then it was exchanged for, like, you know, a magnification and other things. Like, suddenly no one was playing rock music anymore, everyone was playing like R&B. Like TLC and things like that, like in the late 90s when I was... Well, it was in the mid-90s when I was, like, doing this certificate as a gym instructor at the time, and everyone was, you know, a couple years after that, when you were doing aerobics, everyone was playing TLC. Don't go chasing waterfalls. Which most people don't know, that TLC song, which is, you know, it's a great catchy song, right? most people don't know, but when you listen to the lyrics, it's literally about like, you know, don't go chasing the waterfall, don't go dealing drugs and getting this waterfall of money and then dying. It's actually about drug dealing, okay? But it's not about a drug dealing in the way, like, a Takashi 669, or this art, this, like, kind of like this grotesque. thing, it's really actually poetic and well-written, right? So I'm not like criticizing that kind of stuff. I'm not criticizing really, you know, stuff that actually talks about stuff. I'm just saying there's a magnification, that's all they were else, you know, like your, I forgot a lot of the music that used to listen to in the 90s, you know, like, um... I'm just trying, I've listened to it so much, I just can't remember it, but there was a difference with the rise of sort of like Tupac, and then there was, on the other side, like, well, there's just a lot of that stuff, right? I can't remember it off the top of my head anymore, it's been too many years. So there is that. By the way, here is something, which I think is interesting. Weirdly, actually, for instance, Erica Kirk, old photographs of her, Erica Kirk today in the courtroom, walked out of the courtroom today when there was a discussion of whether the media should be able to see the evidence and talk about it that's presented within the case, or within the, you know, within the court case. Because apparently there's new evidence that they're looking at, and Erica Kirk walked out of the courtroom. But one thing about Erica Kirk, which I find odd, and there's many oddities to Erica Kirk, obviously she comes from a family that's associated with the military industrial complex very heavily. She's appeared in advertisements for the military industrial complex. Some people say her family members are in the CIA. Lots of people are in the CIA, but, you know, does that strike me as odd? Well, people end up places, you know, if you are, your parents are in the CIA or the military industrial complex, they might get you, if you're a model and stuff like that, get you to appear in an ad. Might not be that odd if we look at it objectively. You know, concentrations of, you know, desire or information within the specific sect are going to... you know, going to be taken advantage of by the mechanisms around them, which is, you know, you appear in an ad or whatever if you're associated with that. So, well, here's something odd about her, which I think is odd. Now, she has had a nose job and things like that, as I've stated, people are saying she had a big nose or whatever, you know, people have big noses, there's nothing wrong with that. But if you are, you know, what would you say, a beauty queen? It would not be unusual to think about, you know, things that you believe are flaws within your face and want to actually take care of those, you know, with the technology or pay for something in order to happen. That's not odd to me. You know, people that are in this industry, a very beauty-orientated industry. She won, what, she missed something? I've gone the name of the state or whatever beauty pageant she won. But she wouldn't be unusual to get a nose job, if you believe your nose is too big. But what is odd is her eye colour is brown, right? Her eye colour is brown. Now, she goes around with blue contacts on, not in a singular event, but she always wears blue contacts. Isn't that the oddest thing? Why would you continuously wear blue contacts? Very odd, I thought, when I first heard this, I was going, what? Because it's not just in photos, it's all the time. Now, people might wear blue contacts, you know, women, of course, there are probably some, well, obviously, there's some women listening to this, you know, Know people that probably wear, maybe they wear them themselves, some blue contacts or some green contacts, or something odd or unusual when they go out for fun. But would you wear those every day? Seems a bit odd, doesn't it? Would you wear different coloured contact lenses every single day of your life? Okay, well, it's what it seems like. Maybe…